Conflict Conversations with Your Leadership Team: Lead Clearly —Don’t Play the Secret Therapist
To protect yourself from narcissists
Leadership Conflict Talks: Clear Structure, Real Accountability
Conflicts inside a leadership team are part of business. Strong personalities, high pressure, competing interests—friction follows. That friction can create clarity or stall the entire operation.
Many CEOs slip into a role that’s neither in their contract nor healthy: they become the team’s secret therapist. They compensate, soothe, explain, comfort—and eventually carry the emotional load of the whole organization.
This guide shows you how to run conflict conversations so you fulfill your leadership mandate: clear, structured, accountable, results-oriented—and respectful of people.
Common Pitfall: Playing the Secret Therapist
Conflicts in the leadership team trigger two strong impulses:
-
A wish for calm and performance in the system
-
Compassion for people who are struggling
From this mix a hidden extra role emerges:
-
You hear long one-on-one stories
-
You collect emotions
-
You explain one person’s behavior to the other
-
You try to understand and relieve every side
Short-term relief follows. Long-term consequences:
-
You become the system’s emotional container
-
Responsibility shifts away from those involved—toward you
-
Conflicts turn into chronic themes instead of decision processes
Top-level leadership thrives on clarity: you lead, you don’t therapize relationships. You hold the frame in which others take responsibility—for behavior, communication, and results.
Your Job in a Conflict Talk: Hold the Frame, Clarify Facts, Assign Responsibility
Hold the frame
You define:
-
Who’s at the table
-
Why you’re meeting
-
How long you’ll talk
-
How you’ll interact
Examples:
-
“Tomorrow the three of us meet for one hour. Goal: a workable agreement for your collaboration on Project X.”
-
“This conversation is to hear perspectives, clarify impacts, and agree on concrete rules for the future.”
The frame signals: this is leadership, not an endless exchange of moods.
Clarify facts
Conflicts include emotions and concrete incidents. You steer toward the incidents:
-
Which situations triggered tension?
-
Which commitments were missing or broken?
-
What impact did it have on team, projects, clients?
You shift the focus from “He’s difficult” to “In situation X, Y happened, with Z as a consequence.”
Assign responsibility
Leaders own responsibility for:
-
Their behavior
-
Their communication
-
Their contribution to solutions
Questions that work:
-
“What part do you own in this situation?”
-
“What contribution will you make to a solution?”
This makes it clear: conflict handling is leadership work, and everyone at the table is an active shaper.
Structure for Triad and Team Talks: When A and B Are at Odds
Clear structure reduces justification loops and old stories.
Step 1: Frame and rules
Open with goal and ground rules:
“Goal: a workable basis for your collaboration. Each gets speaking time. We stay respectful, focus on concrete situations, and on what you’ll do going forward.”
Rules: let others finish, no personal attacks, focus on the business context.
Step 2: A’s view
A presents:
-
Three core points
-
Each tied to a concrete situation
-
Plus impact on work and team
Your prompts:
-
“What are your three core points?”
-
“What impact do you experience right now?”
B listens and takes notes.
Step 3: B’s view
B gets the same space and structure. You ensure symmetry.
Step 4: Joint clarification
You lift the view:
-
“Where do you see overlap?”
-
“Where is the strongest friction?”
-
“What’s on the task level, what’s on the relationship level?”
You summarize, structure, and condense into crisp formulas.
Step 5: Agreements
End with clear rules:
-
“In meetings we raise topics X directly.”
-
“We give each other timely feedback one-on-one.”
-
“Decisions on Project Y: jointly in the weekly check-in.”
Close with:
“We document these agreements, give them six weeks, and then review the effect together.”
Mini-dialogue: chaotic vs. facilitated
Unstructured
A: “You’re always stabbing me in the back.”
B: “That’s untrue—you’re the blocker.”
A: “Ask the team!”
It spins.
Facilitated
You: “A, name one concrete case from the last four weeks where you felt bypassed.”
A: “In last week’s steering when B proposed a different path without alignment.”
You: “Good—that’s Point 1. B, how did you see that moment?”
Now there’s structure, not sparring.
Acknowledge Emotional Force —Stay Out of the Drama
Leadership conflicts touch identity: status, influence, recognition, old wounds. That adds force. Leadership means: respect emotion and keep direction.
Name the emotion
Short sentences go far:
-
“I can feel how much energy this brings up for both of you.”
-
“This clearly touches you.”
People feel seen.
Redirect the focus
Then you point to shaping:
-
“This intensity shows how important the topic is. Let’s use it to build solutions.”
-
“The disappointment is understandable. Now let’s focus on what you can actively change.”
Emotion gets space. Focus stays on responsibility and action.
Your calm as anchor
Your presence sets the tone:
-
Slower breathing
-
Clear, steady voice
-
Upright, relaxed posture
You signal: this situation is leadable. Calm is contagious and reduces drama.
Follow-Through: Document, Detect Relapse, Stay Consistent
Conflict talks work through consistent follow-up.
Document agreements
Send a short recap:
-
Core conflict in one sentence
-
Agreements made
-
Timeline until the check-in
Schedule the follow-up
Put a date in four to eight weeks directly on the calendar:
“On this date we’ll review how your collaboration has developed.”
Address relapses
Old patterns can reappear in new packaging. Watch for:
-
Team feedback
-
Subtle barbs in meetings
-
Blocked decisions
At follow-up:
“We agreed to handle X and Y differently. I’m seeing the old pattern again in Z. What’s needed now so the new way takes hold?”
Communicate to the broader team
People watch leadership dynamics closely. Without sharing details, send a signal:
“We’ve addressed a leadership tension and made concrete agreements. Key point: collaboration responsibility sits with the leaders, and we handle such topics deliberately.”
This builds trust.
Self-Care After Hard Conflict Talks
Conflict talks tax you as well. Lead your own resources.
Three simple moves:
-
Unload the body: brief walk, intentional breathing, a short round of movement
-
Reflect briefly: “What worked especially well?” “Where do I want more clarity or brevity next time?”
-
Use sparring: a short debrief with a coach or trusted peer to spot patterns and sharpen your style
You stay flexible instead of burning out.
When External Support Fits—and How to Propose It
Sometimes history and personality dynamics run deep. External support helps.
Signals:
-
Same issues keep returning for months
-
Factions form in the leadership team
-
Teams clearly suffer
-
Personal slights, power struggles, or narcissistic patterns dominate
What an external coach/mediator provides:
-
Neutral perspective
-
Structured formats
-
Professional guidance through emotional depth
How to propose it:
“Our leadership collaboration is mission-critical. This conflict consumes a lot of energy. I propose we use external facilitation to strengthen how we work together.”
You lead—and you use the right resources.
Escalation Path: From Conflict to Consequence
Even with clear talks, agreements, and external help, behavior can remain destructive. Then leadership adds consequence.
Ask:
-
“What’s the impact on team, clients, results, culture?”
-
“What steps have we already taken?”
-
“What message do we send if this behavior continues without consequence?”
Then proceed:
-
Further clarifying talks
-
Clear performance/behavior agreements
-
Professional separation if behavior doesn’t change
You connect conflict handling with the duty to shape the whole system.
Lead Clearly—Don’t Play Therapist
Leadership conflicts carry high potential—for innovation, clarity, and cultural growth. They also drain energy if you become the default outlet for unspoken emotions.
You strengthen your company when you lead conflicts with structure:
-
Set the frame
-
Clarify facts
-
Assign responsibility
-
Steer triad and team talks
-
See emotion without entering drama
-
Follow through
-
Care for yourself
-
Use external support
-
Apply consequences when needed
This builds a leadership culture where conflicts neither get buried nor explode—yet steadily mature into trust, clarity, and collective effectiveness.
Support
I’ve prepared an overview of where I can help through coaching and consulting (no legal advice).
Contact Me for More Information
If you have specific questions or want to know more about how I can help, just ask me directly. For questions that might interest others, please feel free to post them in the comments section below.
Looking for Professional Support?
If you're interested in coaching, training, or consulting, have organizational questions, or would like to schedule an appointment, the best way to reach me is through this contact form (where you can choose whether to provide your personal data) or by email at mail@karstennoack.com. You can find the privacy policy here.
Transparency and Frequently Asked Questions
Transparency is important to me. To help you get started, I've provided answers to frequently asked questions about myself (profile), the services I offer, fees, and the process of getting to know me. If you like what you see, I'd be delighted to work with you.
Remarks:
In the address bar of your browser, the URL should begin with "https://www.karstennoack.com/...". This indicates a secure connection (SSL). Whether you enter your real name is up to you.
This article is a short excerpt from the more comprehensive course materials my clients receive in group or individual training or coaching.
Published: January 12th, 2018
Author: Karsten Noack
Revision: November 13th, 2025
Translation: ./.
German version:
0 Comments